GIBP
Sandbox only: synthetic funds, synthetic provider choices and synthetic performance. No live quote, production counterparty or partnership is implied.

Intent-to-execution sandbox.

Change the financial objective, compile policy, see why routes are rejected and inspect a synthetic execution receipt.

GIBP Intent SandboxSynthetic

No real funds. No live provider quote. No partnership implied.

Compiled policy

Intent is eligible for simulation

Cost > certainty > speed

Selected plan

Split plan: local liquidity + bank settlement

5.8 bps synthetic

Route A — exceeds capital-cost threshold
Route B — FX + prefunding produces higher total cost
Synthetic execution receipt
{
  "environment": "sandbox",
  "intent_id": "int_sandbox_0042",
  "deliver": "SGD equivalent",
  "funding": "GBP",
  "amount": "10000000",
  "priority": "Cost > certainty > speed",
  "policy": "eligible",
  "plan": "Split plan: local liquidity + bank settlement",
  "economic_cost": "5.8 bps synthetic",
  "evidence": "synthetic"
}

Shadow example

Observed fact versus modelled counterfactual.

Observed transaction

Execution model
Existing provider route
Total economic cost
Observed input
Liquidity consumed
Observed input
Settlement time
Observed input

GIBP counterfactual

Eligible plans
Modelled
Best total economic cost
Modelled
Potential liquidity reduction
Modelled
Confidence / assumptions
Disclosed

Illustration only. GIBP Shadow must keep observed facts separate from counterfactual estimates and expose the assumptions used in any ROI calculation.

Read the Shadow methodology →