See what GIBP would have done before it moves a cent.

Analyse historical or live transaction information in observation mode. Quantify potential economic and liquidity improvements without granting execution authority.

No money movement

Policy-aware alternatives

Evidence-backed ROI

Liquidity impact

Observed transaction

Execution model: Existing provider route
Total economic cost: Observed input
Liquidity consumed: Observed input
Settlement time: Observed input

GIBP counterfactual

Eligible plans: Modelled
Best total economic cost: Modelled
Potential liquidity reduction: Modelled
Confidence / assumptions: Disclosed

Illustration only. GIBP Shadow must keep observed facts separate from counterfactual estimates and expose the assumptions used in any ROI calculation.

Methodology

Conservative by construction.

Observed inputs

Existing provider, amount, currency, fees, FX, timestamps, repair/failure data and relevant liquidity inputs remain source facts.

Eligible alternatives

Policy removes options that would not have been permitted at the relevant point in time.

Counterfactual model

GIBP estimates alternative cost, timing, liquidity and execution outcomes using disclosed assumptions.

Evidence separation

Observed facts, modelled estimates, targets and missing data are never collapsed into one number.

Shadow outputs are decision-support estimates, not guarantees. A production assessment defines the data, baseline, assumptions, confidence treatment and review process before ROI is communicated.

Request a Shadow assessment.

Tell us your current provider mix, priority corridors and what you want to measure. No execution authority is required for the initial assessment.

Start the conversation